Why we hate the Educational Establishment of Knowledge?

Knowledge has lead to cancer, schizophrenia, or suicide? And 'This is the kind of thing you want on your enemy?

Knowledge makes people less human, and more likely to fail in the workplace and marriage? Are you mad knowledge, and to ramble on the moon?

Existential knowledge is our enemy? Some people suffer from a lethal dose of knowledge? If knowledge gain idea to keep us awake at night?

In short, knowledge is a bad thing?

Of course.

We know that our educational establishment hates knowledge. I hate, hate, hate. Whenever possible, people pushed out of school, like nuclear waste. Why?

Knowledge hostility could define the topic of education the American public, and the most difficult to explain. But we need to try.

E 'was shocking to see the greatest educators of the 20th century with a heart attack knowledge attack cold. Following John Dewey, often considered the father of American education: "I believe that we violate the child's nature ... introducing the child too quickly to a series of specific studies, reading, writing, geography, etc., contact with his social life I think. therefore, that the true center of correlation of school subjects is not science, or literature, or history, or geography, but the child's own social activities "(My pedagogic creed, 1897 ).

Two of the biggest names (Thorndike and Gates) announced in a book in 1929 for the teachers. "Artificial exercises, like drills on phonetics, multiplication tables, and formal writing movements are used to extravagant levels of lessons, such as arithmetic, language, and history include content that is little intrinsic value."

In 1951, an actor named Lauchner concludes this bizarre orthodoxy: "Over the years we have built a sort of halo around reading, writing, arithmetic, and we told everyone ... The 3R for all children, and all children . 3 R! was. We have made some progress in getting rid of this slogan, but from time to time some mothers with premium Phi Beta Kappa or some employers who have hired a girl who can not mean raise a fuss about the school and the missing ... When we realized that not all children to read, search, write and write ... and that many of them can not or will not master this job ... then we are on the road to improving the curriculum averages. '

Bitchy tone. Their minds are closed. The knowledge is toxic. Where does this strange belief come from? Most people use common sense does not see a threat in knowledge. But educators elite certainly do.

The reason was, historically, to build schools suddenly bad idea. And with this logic, one can start unbuild (ie, dumb down) the traditional school. If you hate science, you should hate any method or program that instills knowledge. This is the model that is seen throughout the 20th century.

-----------------------------

What exactly is it that they hate so much? Let me talk to you about the Danube, and you know that is a river in Germany and Hungary, you're worse?

If someone said that the flight plan at 20,000 feet, and you think, is almost four kilometers, you lose?

You are required to buy a liter of milk, but there are only containers liters, so buy eight. A tragedy?

Say you're working on an assembly line, is the most difficult job, because you know the capital of Idaho? Suppose you drive a tractor, plow the fields all day, is a work made worse if you can quote the speech of Shakespeare?

Suppose you are listening to the radio and heard a report that the E. coli in lettuce near the town in which you happen to be traveling. You know what's worse?

Knowledge only what you know. A stone knows zero. A man always knows many things. Because the stones better?

Our educational establishment, hard and full of insults, belittling knowledge reluctant puritan way of sin. But what, at the end of the day, it is the educational institution you hope to achieve? Here are the latest expressions (about 1995) of their thoughts:

"The authors of mathematics municipalities do not think that is the 'time' students and worth the effort to develop fully the high efficiency paper and pencil algorithms for all possible whole number, fraction and decimal division problems. Mastery of complexity algorithm is a big commitment, what experience tells us will fail for many students. 's only counterproductive to invest many hours of valuable lessons such algorithms. These mathematical results are not worth the cost, especially because quotients can be found quickly and accuracy with a calculator. "

That candida. It 'clear that the end of the day medicine man takes less mathematics. They talk about long division, something that hundreds of millions of people have learned to do it pretty easily. But this, we are told, is an impossible mission. Let's not even try.

What will the school do with all this free time? Our so-called educators to create the fiction that the work that has gone all day and all week. Students learn a bit '. Worse, they end up confused and hostile to mathematics and basic skills.

Demonize. Delete. Dilute what remains. This is the formula for the trivialization of public schools, and to go with him should have told us that knowledge is useless and perhaps evil. Not worth the time students!

What motivates the foolish prophets? John Dewey and almost all of the best people in the field of education during the last century were the socialists, Marxists, communists, several variations. At the end, they want to change society. Of course I do not want people to find their own answers and to think their own thoughts. It 's simple, if the child is limited and restricted, docile and dependent, ignorant and illiterate.

If you're not a socialist, pretend for a moment that you are. Then you will know the total clearly the only way to gain control of this company is to make all stupid and passive.

The demon project becomes easier if only state that the knowledge may be suitable for the nobility, but now, in the era of democracy, the concept of obsolescence. The fact is not something that kids have time to worry about their busy school day. Just consider the tone of their "authors" in mathematics daily, as they have written off as impossible that millions of children can do (ie, arithmetic).

Currently crusade against the author before science, Henry Ford et al need millions of workers to do the job very easy. Perhaps it could be concluded that only a limited education. But as the 20th century moved along, everything is more complicated. Since the second World War, it was clear that our public schools are not literate young enough to serve in the armed forces - 1 million euro must be rejected.

In the second half of the century, the information and the machine continues to be complicated. In comes the computer. Now we live in the age of complexity. But the educational establishment, the old fossil, not to make adjustments in his thought. One of our goals is social engineering. It was their vision, Kool-Aid flowing in their veins. They are most opposed to the new era.

Thus, failure and pain that made each child gets bigger. Now, in 2012, nearly one third of all children out of school. The other three almost completely ignorant. Because this is not to offend people?

Children do not leave because they learn everything they need to learn or can learn. They left because the theories and methods used in public schools, makes learning difficult. Almost everything is done in public schools is like patting your stomach and at the same time, rubbing his head. Whole word, just as an example, is a study in schizophrenia disorientation. The methods used in public schools seems to have been designed by technocrats Pavlov to make the children confused, inhibited, depressed, confused - choose what you like.

Dewey and his band have centuries-old war against science, against children, and for this country. And 'this statement strikes you as too extreme? Just look at the statistics bad - are all around us. Just look at the curriculum - are ineffective or worse. There is no doubt that our educational institution is anti-education. You can not make people stupid and then pretend to worry about education.

However, the game takes place. The method used in our public schools probably intended to limit the knowledge - that is their real goal. Schools, for example, preached the doctrine Constructivism. The children have to find things for themselves. Sometimes that works and you have impressive results. But for the most part, constructivism means that in a given year, the children are learning the knowledge and even less than they did in previous years. It 's like that with each method. When you look at the actual results in the classroom, you will realize that children are pressed and insensitive.

Education is rarely a bad thing, knowledge is rarely a bad thing. A place that hates science education is always a bad thing.